[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170410163553.GB31356@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:35:53 -0400
From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
qiuxishi@...wei.com, Kani Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@....com>,
slaoub@...il.com, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...il.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Tobias Regnery <tobias.regnery@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/9] mm: make movable onlining suck less
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 01:03:42PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi,
> The last version of this series has been posted here [1]. It has seen
> some more serious testing (thanks to Reza Arbab) and fixes for the found
> issues. I have also decided to drop patch 1 [2] because it turned out to
> be more complicated than I initially thought [3]. Few more patches were
> added to deal with expectation on zone/node initialization.
>
> I have rebased on top of the current mmotm-2017-04-07-15-53. It
> conflicts with HMM because it touches memory hotplug as
> well. We have discussed [4] with Jérôme and he agreed to
> rebase on top of this rework [5] so I have reverted his series
> before applyig mine. I will help him to resolve the resulting
> conflicts. You can find the whole series including the HMM revers in
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git branch
> attempts/rewrite-mem_hotplug
>
So updated HMM patchset :
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~glisse/linux/log/?h=hmm-v20
I am not posting yet as it seems there is couple thing you need to
fix in your patchset first. However if you could review :
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~glisse/linux/commit/?h=hmm-v20&id=84fc68534e781cf6125d02b3bfdba4a51e82d9c9
As it was your idea, i just want to make sure i didn't denatured
it :)
Also as side note, v20 fix build issue by restricting HMM to x86-64
which is safer than pretending this can be use on any random arch
as build failures i am getting clearly shows that thing i assumed to
be true on all arch aren't.
Cheers,
Jérôme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists