[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170410164201.342051876@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:41:18 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 026/152] ring-buffer: Fix return value check in test_ringbuffer()
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
commit 62277de758b155dc04b78f195a1cb5208c37b2df upstream.
In case of error, the function kthread_run() returns ERR_PTR()
and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value check
should be replaced with IS_ERR().
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466184839-14927-1-git-send-email-weiyj_lk@163.com
Fixes: 6c43e554a ("ring-buffer: Add ring buffer startup selftest")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -4870,9 +4870,9 @@ static __init int test_ringbuffer(void)
rb_data[cpu].cnt = cpu;
rb_threads[cpu] = kthread_create(rb_test, &rb_data[cpu],
"rbtester/%d", cpu);
- if (WARN_ON(!rb_threads[cpu])) {
+ if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(rb_threads[cpu]))) {
pr_cont("FAILED\n");
- ret = -1;
+ ret = PTR_ERR(rb_threads[cpu]);
goto out_free;
}
@@ -4882,9 +4882,9 @@ static __init int test_ringbuffer(void)
/* Now create the rb hammer! */
rb_hammer = kthread_run(rb_hammer_test, NULL, "rbhammer");
- if (WARN_ON(!rb_hammer)) {
+ if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(rb_hammer))) {
pr_cont("FAILED\n");
- ret = -1;
+ ret = PTR_ERR(rb_hammer);
goto out_free;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists