[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f8fae9b-82fa-ec98-e381-25e60733fe22@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:06:41 +0300
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@...il.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Cc: joculator@...il.com, al1img@...il.com, vlad.babchuk@...il.com,
andrii.anisov@...il.com, olekstysh@...il.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, lars.kurth@...rix.com,
sstabellini@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@...m.com>,
Oleksandr Grytsov <oleksandr_grytsov@...m.com>
Subject: Re: [For Linux 4/4] xen/displif: add ABI for para-virtual display
On 04/10/2017 09:03 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 07/04/17 16:02, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> Hi, Julien!
>>
>> On 04/07/2017 04:50 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi Oleksandr,
>>>
>>> On 07/04/17 09:30, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>>> +/*
>>>> +
>>>> ******************************************************************************
>>>>
>>>> + * Back to front events delivery
>>>> +
>>>> ******************************************************************************
>>>>
>>>> + * In order to deliver asynchronous events from back to front a
>>>> shared page is
>>>> + * allocated by front and its granted reference propagated to back via
>>>> + * XenStore entries (evt-ring-ref/evt-event-channel).
>>>> + * This page has a common header used by both front and back to
>>>> synchronize
>>>> + * access and control event's ring buffer, while back being a
>>>> producer of the
>>>> + * events and front being a consumer. The rest of the page after the
>>>> header
>>>> + * is used for event packets.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Upon reception of an event(s) front may confirm its reception
>>>> + * for either each event, group of events or none.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +struct xendispl_event_page {
>>>> + uint32_t in_cons;
>>>> + uint32_t in_prod;
>>>> + uint8_t reserved[56];
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +#define XENDISPL_EVENT_PAGE_SIZE 4096
>>> This will be always the size of a grant (e.g xen page size), right? If
>>> so, I would prefer if you use XEN_PAGE_SIZE to so we can easily update
>>> Linux in the case Xen is using a different page size.
>>>
>>> Note that the Front-end, Backend and Xen may use different page size,
>>> so your drivers would need to cope with that. The current approach is
>>> to always use the page granularity of Xen.
>>>
>> Will the following satisfy the requirement?
>> #define XENDISPL_EVENT_PAGE_SIZE XEN_PAGE_SIZE
>>
>>>> +#define XENDISPL_IN_RING_OFFS (sizeof(struct xendispl_event_page))
>>>> +#define XENDISPL_IN_RING_SIZE (XENDISPL_EVENT_PAGE_SIZE -
>>>> XENDISPL_IN_RING_OFFS)
>>>> +#define XENDISPL_IN_RING_LEN (XENDISPL_IN_RING_SIZE / sizeof(struct
>>>> xendispl_evt))
>>>> +#define XENDISPL_IN_RING(page) \
>>>> + ((struct xendispl_evt *)((char *)(page) + XENDISPL_IN_RING_OFFS))
>>>> +#define XENDISPL_IN_RING_REF(page, idx) \
>>>> + (XENDISPL_IN_RING((page))[(idx) % XENDISPL_IN_RING_LEN])
>>>> +
>>>> +#endif /* __XEN_PUBLIC_IO_DISPLIF_H__ */
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Local variables:
>>>> + * mode: C
>>>> + * c-file-style: "BSD"
>>>> + * c-basic-offset: 4
>>>> + * tab-width: 4
>>>> + * indent-tabs-mode: nil
>>>> + * End:
>>>> + */
> I believe you'll send V2 due to the XEN_PAGE_SIZE usage?
yes
>
> Can you then please remove the editor mode settings block in each
> header, too? Those are disliked in the Linux tree.
sure, I will
>
>
> Juergen
Do you mind if I keep your acks for V2 with these changes?
Thank you,
Oleksandr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists