[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1704101906280.2906@nanos>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 19:08:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
vikas.shivappa@...el.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, h.peter.anvin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/intel_rdt: Fix issue when mkdir uses a freed
CLOSid
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 05:20:24PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > That's just wrong.
> >
> > The proper behaviour for a new control group is, that at the time when it
> > is created it copies the CBM values of the default group and not claiming
> > access to ALL of the cache by default.
>
> I don't see that as any more helpful. When you make a new
> control group it is because none of the existing groups
> provides the QoS that you want. So the first thing the
> user will do is write the schemata file with the values
> they do want.
>
> So "all access", or "same as default group" are both the
> same to the user ... not what they want.
>
> We do need to make sure that the schemata matches what is
> in the registers. We need to make sure that changes to the
> schemata file result in the MSRs being written where needed.
That's true today. The MSRs and the schemata file of a newly created group
always match. So there's nothing to fix, right?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists