lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:42:05 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Nikolaus Schulz <nikolaus.schulz@...onic-design.de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.10 014/110] iio: core: Fix IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2 for negative values

4.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Nikolaus Schulz <nikolaus.schulz@...onic-design.de>

commit 7fd6592d1287046f61bfd3cda3c03cd35be490f7 upstream.

Fix formatting of negative values of type IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2 by
switching from do_div(), which can't handle negative numbers, to
div_s64_rem().  Also use shift_right for shifting, which is safe with
negative values.

Signed-off-by: Nikolaus Schulz <nikolaus.schulz@...onic-design.de>
Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c |    7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
@@ -608,10 +608,9 @@ static ssize_t __iio_format_value(char *
 		tmp0 = (int)div_s64_rem(tmp, 1000000000, &tmp1);
 		return snprintf(buf, len, "%d.%09u", tmp0, abs(tmp1));
 	case IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2:
-		tmp = (s64)vals[0] * 1000000000LL >> vals[1];
-		tmp1 = do_div(tmp, 1000000000LL);
-		tmp0 = tmp;
-		return snprintf(buf, len, "%d.%09u", tmp0, tmp1);
+		tmp = shift_right((s64)vals[0] * 1000000000LL, vals[1]);
+		tmp0 = (int)div_s64_rem(tmp, 1000000000LL, &tmp1);
+		return snprintf(buf, len, "%d.%09u", tmp0, abs(tmp1));
 	case IIO_VAL_INT_MULTIPLE:
 	{
 		int i;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ