linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 008/152] drm/vmwgfx: fix integer overflow in vmw_surface_define

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170410164200.359861792@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:41:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Li Qiang <liqiang6-s@....cn>,
        Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 008/152] drm/vmwgfx: fix integer overflow in vmw_surface_define_ioctl()

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Li Qiang <liq3ea@...il.com>

commit e7e11f99564222d82f0ce84bd521e57d78a6b678 upstream.

In vmw_surface_define_ioctl(), the 'num_sizes' is the sum of the
'req->mip_levels' array. This array can be assigned any value from
the user space. As both the 'num_sizes' and the array is uint32_t,
it is easy to make 'num_sizes' overflow. The later 'mip_levels' is
used as the loop count. This can lead an oob write. Add the check of
'req->mip_levels' to avoid this.

Signed-off-by: Li Qiang <liqiang6-s@....cn>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
@@ -713,8 +713,11 @@ int vmw_surface_define_ioctl(struct drm_
 			128;
 
 	num_sizes = 0;
-	for (i = 0; i < DRM_VMW_MAX_SURFACE_FACES; ++i)
+	for (i = 0; i < DRM_VMW_MAX_SURFACE_FACES; ++i) {
+		if (req->mip_levels[i] > DRM_VMW_MAX_MIP_LEVELS)
+			return -EINVAL;
 		num_sizes += req->mip_levels[i];
+	}
 
 	if (num_sizes > DRM_VMW_MAX_SURFACE_FACES * DRM_VMW_MAX_MIP_LEVELS ||
 	    num_sizes == 0)