lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:31:43 +0530
From:   Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     mpe@...erman.id.au, chris@...troguy.com, npiggin@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org,
        aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, anton@...ba.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ppc64/kprobe: Fix oops when kprobed on 'stdu'
 instruction

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:38:13AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> If we set a kprobe on a 'stdu' instruction on powerpc64, we see a kernel 
> OOPS:
> 
>   [ 1275.165932] Bad kernel stack pointer cd93c840 at c000000000009868
>   [ 1275.166378] Oops: Bad kernel stack pointer, sig: 6 [#1]
>   ...
>   GPR00: c000001fcd93cb30 00000000cd93c840 c0000000015c5e00 00000000cd93c840
>   ...
>   [ 1275.178305] NIP [c000000000009868] resume_kernel+0x2c/0x58
>   [ 1275.178594] LR [c000000000006208] program_check_common+0x108/0x180
> 
> Basically, on 64 bit system, when user probes on 'stdu' instruction,
> kernel does not emulate actual store in emulate_step itself because it
> may corrupt exception frame. So kernel does actual store operation in
> exception return code i.e. resume_kernel().
> 
> resume_kernel() loads the saved stack pointer from memory using lwz,
> effectively loading a corrupt (32bit) address, causing the kernel crash.
> 
> Fix this by loading the 64bit value instead.
> 
> Fixes: be96f63375a1 ("powerpc: Split out instruction analysis part of emulate_step()") 
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> 

Reviewed-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ