[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170411063738.GE3670@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:07:38 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>,
Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] cpufreq: imx6q: Set max suspend_freq to avoid
changes during suspend
On 04-04-17, 20:04, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> If the cpufreq driver tries to modify voltage/freq during suspend/resume
> it might need to control an external PMIC via I2C or SPI but those
> devices might be already suspended. This issue is likely to happen
> whenever the LDOs have their vin-supply set.
>
> To avoid this scenario we just increase cpufreq to the maximum before
> suspend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
I have already Acked this earlier, why didn't you add it ?
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists