linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v2 0/9] mm: make movable onlining suck less

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170411084142.GB6729@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:41:42 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
        qiuxishi@...wei.com, Kani Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@....com>,
        slaoub@...il.com, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...il.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Tobias Regnery <tobias.regnery@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/9] mm: make movable onlining suck less

On Tue 11-04-17 10:01:52, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:56:39 +0200
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
[...]
> > > #echo online_kernel > memory32/state
> > > write error: Invalid argument
> > > // that's not what's expected  
> > 
> > this is proper behavior with the current implementation. Does anything
> > depend on the zone reusing?
> if we didn't have zone imbalance issue in design,
> the it wouldn't matter but as it stands it's not
> minore issue.
> 
> Consider following,
> one hotplugs some memory and onlines it as movable,
> then one needs to hotplug some more but to do so 
> one one needs more memory from zone NORMAL and to keep
> zone balance some memory in MOVABLE should be reonlined
> as NORMAL

Is this something that we absolutely have to have right _now_? Or are you
OK if I address this in follow up series? Because it will make the
current code slightly more complex and to be honest I would rather like
to see this "core" merge and build more on top.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs