linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 00/10] Nokia H4+ support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:36:44 +0200
From:   Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/10] Nokia H4+ support

Hi Sebastian,

>>>>>> Here is PATCHv3 for the Nokia bluetooth patchset. I addressed all comments from
>>>>>> Rob and Pavel regarding the serdev patches and dropped the *.dts patches, since
>>>>>> they were queued by Tony. I also changed the patch order, so that the serdev
>>>>>> patches come first. All of them have Acked-by from Rob, so I think it makes
>>>>>> sense to merge them to serdev subsystem (now) and provide an immutable branch
>>>>>> for the bluetooth subsystem.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Greg doesn't read cover letters generally and since the serdev patches
>>>>> are Cc rather than To him, he's probably not planning to pick them up.
>>>> 
>>>> I wonder actually if we should merge all of these via bluetooth-next
>>>> tree with proper Ack from Greg. However it would be good to also get
>>>> buy in from Dave for merging this ultimately through net-next.
>>> 
>>> I don't really care where it goes.  I can take the whole thing in my
>>> tty/serial tree now if no one objects and I get an ack from the relevant
>>> maintainers {hint...}
>> 
>> I think it is better if it goes thru BT tree. I have another driver
>> converted that is dependent on this series. There's a couple other
>> serdev changes on the list too, but this shouldn't depend on them.
> 
> Is this waiting for something, or could it be queued to
> bluetooth-next then? It would be nice to finally have
> this in 4.12 :)

I would prefer if we can get an ACK from Greg. Then I merge it through the bluetooth-next tree.

Regards

Marcel