[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hSAmXF+Y42iz2h54NoTOf5Pn7HJFWZ=N9bfBH4q9w9zA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:01:42 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent
transition delays
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 11-04-17, 00:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>
>> Make the schedutil governor take the initial (default) value of the
>> rate_limit_us sysfs attribute from the (new) transition_delay_us
>> policy parameter (to be set by the scaling driver).
>>
>> That will allow scaling drivers to make schedutil use smaller default
>> values of rate_limit_us and reduce the default average time interval
>> between consecutive frequency changes.
>>
>> Make intel_pstate set transition_delay_us to 500.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> ---
>>
>> This is a replacement for https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9671831/
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 ++
>> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 7 +++++++
>> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Should we use this new value for the ondemand/conservative governors as well?
We might, but it is mostly for schedutil.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists