[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170411024215.GA10664@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:42:15 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the kbuild tree
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:21:19AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the crypto tree got a conflict in:
>
> include/linux/crypto.h
>
> between commit:
>
> c394d1683e7c ("cryptouser.h: fix include from userland")
>
> from the kbuild tree and commit:
>
> f437a3f477cc ("crypto: api - Extend algorithm name limit to 128 bytes")
>
> from the crypto tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I used the former version of this file and added the
> following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Actually the patch in the kbuild tree should be reverted because
we have now increased the in-kernel length limit and this must not
be directly exposed to user-space or it'll break compatibility.
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists