linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.10 084/110] [media] rx51: broken build

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170411144202.GB12842@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:42:02 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.10 084/110] [media] rx51: broken build

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:44:58PM +0100, Sean Young wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 06:43:15PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > 
> > ------------------
> > 
> > From: Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
> > 
> > [ Upstream commit 922ee72da7c739157ed02ea04a5c100d19f67226 ]
> > 
> > As reported by kernel build test:
> > 
> >    In file included from arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:15:0:
> > >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:536:49: error: 'rx51_lirc_data' undeclared here (not in a function)
> >      OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nokia,n900-ir", 0, "n900-ir", &rx51_lirc_data),
> >                                                     ^
> >    include/linux/of_platform.h:52:21: note: in definition of macro 'OF_DEV_AUXDATA'
> >        .platform_data = _pdata }
> >                         ^~~~~~
> > 
> > Since "a92def1 [media] ir-rx51: port to rc-core" the build fails on
> > some arm configurations.
> 
> This commit is not in v4.10, so this patch does not apply to v4.10 just
> like does not apply to v4.9.

Yes, already dropped, thanks.

greg k-h