linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/32] mfd: exynos-lpass: Use common soc/exynos-regs-pmu.h header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170411163438.yhbe22v34d7chit3@dell>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:34:38 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] mfd: exynos-lpass: Use common
 soc/exynos-regs-pmu.h header

On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tuesday 11 April 2017 07:44 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> > 
> >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> >>
> >> The MFD-specific header will go away because it duplicates defines from
> >> exynos-regs-pmu.h.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> >> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > 
> > 
> > Okay, this is confusing.
> > 
> > I'm guessing you're sending this to Greg for inclusion into -stable?
> 
> No, it's not for stable. It's for 4.12.

Then I'm totally confused, since this patch has already been applied,
which is obvious since I already signed it off?

> > Isn't there a way to specify this intention?
> 
> The pull request (cover letter) specifies this intention.

Great!  But you forgot to send it to me, doh!

Why are you sending patches with a pull-request?

> > Also, patch 1 and 3 appear to be identical.
> > 
> > Not even sure how that's possible.

Still have no idea how you managed to do this!

> >> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c | 4 ++--
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
> >> index 2e064fb8826f..8bebad92a385 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
> >> @@ -18,11 +18,11 @@
> >>  #include <linux/io.h>
> >>  #include <linux/module.h>
> >>  #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> >> -#include <linux/mfd/syscon/exynos5-pmu.h>
> >>  #include <linux/of.h>
> >>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> >> +#include <linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h>
> >>  #include <linux/types.h>
> >>  
> >>  /* LPASS Top register definitions */
> >> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
> >>  
> >>  	/* Activate related PADs from retention state */
> >>  	regmap_write(lpass->pmu, EXYNOS5433_PAD_RETENTION_AUD_OPTION,
> >> -		     EXYNOS5433_PAD_INITIATE_WAKEUP_FROM_LOWPWR);
> >> +		     EXYNOS_WAKEUP_FROM_LOWPWR);
> >>  
> >>  	exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_I2S_SW_RESET);
> >>  	exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_DMA_SW_RESET);
> >>
> > 

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog