linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/152] 4.9.22-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <38bcb13d-1a22-3f52-21a6-c91f83631a72@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2017 20:07:17 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/152] 4.9.22-stable review

On 04/10/2017 09:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.22 release.
> There are 152 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed Apr 12 16:41:34 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>

Build results:
	total: 149 pass: 146 fail: 3
Failed builds:
	arm:allmodconfig
	arm:omap2plus_defconfig
	arm64:allmodconfig

Qemu test results:
	total: 122 pass: 103 fail: 19
Failed tests:
	arm:beagle:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle
	arm:beaglexm:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle-xm
	arm:overo:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-overo-tobi
	arm:sabrelite:multi_v7_defconfig:imx6dl-sabrelite
	arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
	arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
	arm:vexpress-a15-a7:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7
	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc702
	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc706
	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zed
	arm:midway:multi_v7_defconfig:ecx-2000
	arm:smdkc210:multi_v7_defconfig:exynos4210-smdkv310
	arm:beagle:omap2plus_defconfig:omap3-beagle
	arm:beaglexm:omap2plus_defconfig:omap3-beagle-xm
	arm:overo:omap2plus_defconfig:omap3-overo-tobi
	arm64:virt:smp:defconfig
	arm64:xlnx-ep108:smp:defconfig:zynqmp-ep108
	arm64:virt:nosmp:defconfig
	arm64:xlnx-ep108:nosmp:defconfig:zynqmp-ep108

As reported earlier, the arm64 builds fail with

Building arm64:virt:nosmp:defconfig ... failed
------------
Error log:
arch/arm64/Makefile:23: ld does not support --fix-cortex-a53-843419; kernel may be susceptible to erratum
arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c: In function ‘pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping’:
arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c:139:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_resource_consumer’
   adev = acpi_resource_consumer(&cfgres);
...
drivers/pci/host/pcie-hisi.c: In function ‘hisi_pcie_init’:
drivers/pci/host/pcie-hisi.c:94:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_get_rc_resources’

---

The arm builds fail as follows.

Building arm:overo:omap2plus_defconfig:omap3-overo-tobi ... failed
------------
Error log:
In file included from arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:15:0:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:537:49: error: 'rx51_ir_data' undeclared here (not in a function)
   OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nokia,n900-ir", 0, "n900-ir", &rx51_ir_data),
                                                  ^
./include/linux/of_platform.h:52:21: note: in definition of macro 'OF_DEV_AUXDATA'
     .platform_data = _pdata }
                      ^
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.o] Error 1

I am a bit lost here. Reverting

f2ea7a5c3730 rx51: broken build

fixes the problem, but is supposed to accomplish the opposite. You'll need to drop
that patch, or maybe even better drop

375a81645446 ARM: OMAP2+: Fix init for multiple quirks for the same SoC

as well and let the authors [copied] sort this out.

Anyway, details are as always available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Guenter