linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] drm/pl111: Initial drm/kms driver for pl111

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170411181021.GW17774@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2017 19:10:22 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, tom.cooksey@....com,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/pl111: Initial drm/kms driver for pl111

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 09:06:31AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 06:18:01PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> >> v5: Move register definitions inside the driver directory, fix build
> >>     in COMPILE_TEST and !AMBA mode.
> >
> > Why is it necessary to move the register definitions there, when
> > they're already available in linux/amba/clcd.h and are required
> > for the FB driver?
> >
> > It is absurd to have driver specific register definitions.
> 
> Because after v2, v3, and v4, I still didn't have an ack on the patch to
> move the register definitions from linux/amba/clcd.h to
> linux/amba/clcd-reg.h.  If you'd like to go back and ack that, I'd reuse
> them.

I don't remember seeing such a patch, sorry.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.