[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170411200331.nv7bhwglrc7peggu@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 21:03:31 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/16] regulator: madera-ldo1: LDO1 driver for Cirrus
Logic Madera codecs
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 02:20:31PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > In what way? Other than the -gpios stuff (which would just be a trivial
> > thing if we wanted to change it)?
> That's mainly it.
I don't see that as meaningful or a good reason to duplicate the driver
or the binding, it'd be better to just add the new property and
deprecate the old.
> It's not clear which node wlf,ldoena goes in either.
> In the parent? ldo1?
Parent since it's looked up in device context, this is also something
that it seems better to fix in one binding rather than duplicate.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists