[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170411203437.28572-1-broonie@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 21:34:37 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, yibin.gong@....com,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: Allow dummy regulators for supplies
Rather than just not resolving the supply when there is explicitly no
supply mapping fall through and allow a dummy supply to be substituted.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 82205cc5daa7..1e7e6d361238 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1533,14 +1533,6 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
if (IS_ERR(r)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(r);
- if (ret == -ENODEV) {
- /*
- * No supply was specified for this regulator and
- * there will never be one.
- */
- return 0;
- }
-
/* Did the lookup explicitly defer for us? */
if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
return ret;
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists