[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52661d42-b418-116a-0ee8-70cd0a24c51d@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:24:13 +0300
From: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@...aro.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Nair, Jayachandran" <Jayachandran.Nair@...ium.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/3] printk: fix double printing with earlycon
On 04/11/2017 10:43 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2017-04-10 21:00:35, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/10/2017 05:22 PM, Petr Mladek wrote:
>>> On Wed 2017-04-05 23:20:00, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
[..]
>> Thank you for review. Can you (or anybody else) ACK it?
>> I am going to resend the whole series without those empty lines.
>> May I add your Acked-by:?
>
> Sure. Feel free to use:
>
> Acked-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>
> The meaning of the tags is a bit unclear. Acked-by means that
> the maintainer agrees with the idea. But it does not necessarily
> means that she reviewed the code in details. I agree with the idea
> and did the review, so I used the Reviewed-by tag.
>
> Also you do not need to resend the patchset just because the two
> empty lines. Sergey agrees. I will wait day or two and push
> all three patches into the printk.git if nobody complains
> in the meantime. I could remove the two empty lines when doing so.
Ok, then I will not resend it.
> Thanks a lot for the fix and patience.
Thank you for reviewing and acking it.
Aleksey Makarov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists