linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170412164606.08578271@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:46:06 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got conflicts in:

  drivers/block/nbd.c
  drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c
  net/core/dev.c
  net/core/sock.c

between commit:

  717a94b5fc70 ("sched/core: Remove 'task' parameter and rename tsk_restore_flags() to current_restore_flags()")

from the tip tree and commit:

  61d5ad5b2e8a ("treewide: convert PF_MEMALLOC manipulations to new helpers")

from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (the latter is just a superset of the former, so I used
that) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

It looks like there may be more instances that the latter patch should
update.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell