linux-kernel - [tip:perf/core] kprobes/x86: Do not modify singlestep buffer while resuming

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-804dec5bda9b4fcdab5f67fe61db4a0498af5221@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:33:33 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     bp@...en8.de, davem@...emloft.net, ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        dvlasenk@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, brgerst@...il.com,
        mhiramat@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, aryabinin@...tuozzo.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, xiaolong.ye@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
        mingo@...nel.org
Subject: [tip:perf/core] kprobes/x86: Do not modify singlestep buffer while
 resuming

Commit-ID:  804dec5bda9b4fcdab5f67fe61db4a0498af5221
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/804dec5bda9b4fcdab5f67fe61db4a0498af5221
Author:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:00:25 +0900
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:23:45 +0200

kprobes/x86: Do not modify singlestep buffer while resuming

Do not modify singlestep execution buffer (kprobe.ainsn.insn)
while resuming from single-stepping, instead, modifies
the buffer to add a jump back instruction at preparing
buffer.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: David S . Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/149076361560.22469.1610155860343077495.stgit@devbox
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index 6327f95..a654054 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -399,23 +399,36 @@ int __copy_instruction(u8 *dest, u8 *src)
 	return length;
 }
 
+/* Prepare reljump right after instruction to boost */
+static void prepare_boost(struct kprobe *p, int length)
+{
+	if (can_boost(p->ainsn.insn, p->addr) &&
+	    MAX_INSN_SIZE - length >= RELATIVEJUMP_SIZE) {
+		/*
+		 * These instructions can be executed directly if it
+		 * jumps back to correct address.
+		 */
+		synthesize_reljump(p->ainsn.insn + length, p->addr + length);
+		p->ainsn.boostable = 1;
+	} else {
+		p->ainsn.boostable = -1;
+	}
+}
+
 static int arch_copy_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 {
-	int ret;
+	int len;
 
 	/* Copy an instruction with recovering if other optprobe modifies it.*/
-	ret = __copy_instruction(p->ainsn.insn, p->addr);
-	if (!ret)
+	len = __copy_instruction(p->ainsn.insn, p->addr);
+	if (!len)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/*
 	 * __copy_instruction can modify the displacement of the instruction,
 	 * but it doesn't affect boostable check.
 	 */
-	if (can_boost(p->ainsn.insn, p->addr))
-		p->ainsn.boostable = 0;
-	else
-		p->ainsn.boostable = -1;
+	prepare_boost(p, len);
 
 	/* Check whether the instruction modifies Interrupt Flag or not */
 	p->ainsn.if_modifier = is_IF_modifier(p->ainsn.insn);
@@ -878,21 +891,6 @@ static void resume_execution(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
 		break;
 	}
 
-	if (p->ainsn.boostable == 0) {
-		if ((regs->ip > copy_ip) &&
-		    (regs->ip - copy_ip) + 5 < MAX_INSN_SIZE) {
-			/*
-			 * These instructions can be executed directly if it
-			 * jumps back to correct address.
-			 */
-			synthesize_reljump((void *)regs->ip,
-				(void *)orig_ip + (regs->ip - copy_ip));
-			p->ainsn.boostable = 1;
-		} else {
-			p->ainsn.boostable = -1;
-		}
-	}
-
 	regs->ip += orig_ip - copy_ip;
 
 no_change: