linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/8] x86/boot/64: Add support of additional page table level during early boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:18:04 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] x86/boot/64: Add support of additional page table
 level during early boot

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 07:09:07AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I'll look closer (building proccess it's rather complicated), but my
> > understanding is that VDSO is stand-alone binary and doesn't really links
> > with the rest of the kernel, rather included as blob, no?
> > 
> > Andy, may be you have an idea?
> 
> There isn't any way I know of to directly link them together. The ELF 
> format wasn't designed for that. You would need to merge blobs and then use
> manual jump vectors, like the 16bit startup code does. It would be likely
> complicated and ugly.

Ingo, can we proceed without coverting this assembly to C?

I'm committed to convert it to C later if we'll find reasonable solution
to the issue.

We're pretty late into release cycle. It would be nice to give the whole
thing time in tip/master and -next before the merge window.

Can I repost part 4?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov