[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170412205113.5d96637c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:51:13 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mvebu tree with the arm-soc
tree
Hi Gregory,
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:23:07 +0200 Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> How do you want to proceed with this conflict?
>
> Do you want that I merged arm-soc/next/arm64 in my mvebu/defconfig64
> branch before applying my patch ?
>
> Or do you prefer that I continue to base my branch on v4.11-rc1 and then
> you will take care of the conflict when pulling the branch?
The conflict is trivial, I would hope that it will be handled when they
merge your tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists