lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:51:13 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
        Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mvebu tree with the arm-soc
 tree

Hi Gregory,

On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:23:07 +0200 Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> How do you want to proceed with this conflict?
> 
> Do you want that I merged arm-soc/next/arm64 in my mvebu/defconfig64
> branch before applying my patch ?
> 
> Or do you prefer that I continue to base my branch on v4.11-rc1 and then
> you will take care of the conflict when pulling the branch?

The conflict is trivial, I would hope that it will be handled when they
merge your tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ