[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170412120614.6111-7-jlayton@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:06:03 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
tytso@....edu, jack@...e.cz, willy@...radead.org, neilb@...e.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/17] mm: doc comment for scary spot in write_one_page
Not sure what to do here just yet.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index de0dbf12e2c1..3ac8399dc984 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -2388,6 +2388,12 @@ int write_one_page(struct page *page)
ret = mapping->a_ops->writepage(page, &wbc);
if (ret == 0) {
wait_on_page_writeback(page);
+ /*
+ * FIXME: is this racy? What guarantees that PG_error
+ * will still be set once we get around to checking it?
+ * What if writeback fails, but then a read is issued
+ * before we check this, and that calls ClearPageError?
+ */
if (PageError(page))
ret = -EIO;
}
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists