linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] regulator: anatop: only set supply regulator when it actually exists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:36 +0800
From:   Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, yibin.gong@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] regulator: anatop: only set supply regulator when it
 actually exists

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 03:11:01PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
>
>> You're absolutely right!
>> I did this because there're some where else did the same thing.
>> e.g. drivers/regulator/fixed.c.
>
>> But it's obviously none of any platform specific and is perfectly
>> to be handled in regulator core.
>
> Did my patch solve the problems you were seeing?  I just wrote it
> quickly last thing before I finished for the evening.

It can solve the problem.
But it breaks some thing and need a further tiny fix.
I just replied the mail in your patch thread.
Please check it!

Regards
Dong Aisheng