[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BE8371DA886269458E0220A16DC1F8277D622C9E@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 03:22:05 +0000
From: "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>
To: Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
CC: "matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com" <matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com>,
Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>,
"linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kang, Luwei" <luwei.kang@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Yi Z" <yi.z.zhang@...el.com>,
"Luebbers, Enno" <enno.luebbers@...el.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 01/16] docs: fpga: add a document for Intel FPGA driver
overview
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Does this HW Architecture require an Intel FPGA? Couldn't any vendors
> FPGA
> >> > > be used as long as it presented itself the PCIe bus the same and contained
> >> > > an appropriate Device Feature List?
> >
> > I think this is a good (and important) point. Especially when sysfs
> > entries & ioctls constituting ABI depend on it.
>
> Please cc linux-api@...r.kernel.org on your next version of this as
> linux/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst specifies for new system calls.
>
Sure, will cc linux-api@...r.kernel.org on the next version patch set.
Thanks
Hao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists