[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170412225125.GC17774@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 23:51:25 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, tom.cooksey@....com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/pl111: Initial drm/kms driver for pl111
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 02:00:21PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 09:06:31AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> >> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 06:18:01PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> >> >> v5: Move register definitions inside the driver directory, fix build
> >> >> in COMPILE_TEST and !AMBA mode.
> >> >
> >> > Why is it necessary to move the register definitions there, when
> >> > they're already available in linux/amba/clcd.h and are required
> >> > for the FB driver?
> >> >
> >> > It is absurd to have driver specific register definitions.
> >>
> >> Because after v2, v3, and v4, I still didn't have an ack on the patch to
> >> move the register definitions from linux/amba/clcd.h to
> >> linux/amba/clcd-reg.h. If you'd like to go back and ack that, I'd reuse
> >> them.
> >
> > I don't remember seeing such a patch, sorry.
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9654991/
Looks fine, apart from the missing #ifndef...#endif guard around the
header file.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists