[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3dc5ebcf-f8da-99ca-1bd4-6ee734382443@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:07:21 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/6] mm, page_alloc: fix more premature OOM due to race with
cpuset update
On 04/13/2017 08:06 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> Did you really mean node_zonelist() in both the instances above. Because
>> that function just picks up either FALLBACK_ZONELIST or NOFALLBACK_ZONELIST
>> depending upon the passed GFP flags in the allocation request and does not
>> deal with ignoring the passed nodemask.
>
> Oops, I meant policy_zonelist(), thanks for noticing.
Nah, policy_nodemask()... I need coffee.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists