[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170413002139.5983-2-javier@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:21:39 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] hwmon: (lm87) Add OF device ID table
The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices
are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a
I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID and
that the MODALIAS reported will always be of the form i2c:<device>.
But this could change in the future so the correct approach is to have an
OF device ID table if the devices are registered via OF.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
---
Hello,
I should had included this patch in series [0] but it seems that I didn't.
[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/24/360
Best regards,
Javier
Changes in v2:
- Use the correct driver in subject line.
- Keep OF device ID table sorted in the same order than I2C device ID table.
drivers/hwmon/lm87.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm87.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm87.c
index c0766e7392d3..b48d30760388 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lm87.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm87.c
@@ -985,10 +985,18 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id lm87_id[] = {
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, lm87_id);
+static const struct of_device_id lm87_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "ti,lm87" },
+ { .compatible = "adi,adm1024" },
+ { },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, lm87_of_match);
+
static struct i2c_driver lm87_driver = {
.class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
.driver = {
.name = "lm87",
+ .of_match_table = lm87_of_match,
},
.probe = lm87_probe,
.id_table = lm87_id,
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists