[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11306035.2UDh49FpL9@diego>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:22:28 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>,
Liang Chen <cl@...k-chips.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: rk3399: add support for firefly-rk3399 board
Am Donnerstag, 13. April 2017, 12:00:19 CEST schrieb Kever Yang:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On 04/12/2017 09:29 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Hi Kever,
> >
> > Am Montag, 10. April 2017, 11:50:13 CEST schrieb Kever Yang:
> >> Firefly-rk3399 is a bord from T-Firefly, you can find detail about
> >> it here:
> >> http://en.t-firefly.com/en/firenow/Firefly_RK3399/
> >>
> >> This patch add basic node for the board and make it able to bring
> >> up.
> >>
> >> Peripheral works:
> >> - usb hub which connect to ehci controller;
> >> - UART2 debug
> >> - eMMC
> >> - PCIe
> >>
> >> Not work:
> >> - USB 3.0 HOST, type-C port
> >> - sdio, sd-card
> >>
> >> Not test for other peripheral:
> >> - HDMI
> >> - Ethernet
> >> - OPTICAL
> >> - WiFi/BT
> >> - MIPI CSI/DSI
> >> - IR
> >> - EDP/DP
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
> >
> > applied for 4.13, as we're a bit late for 4.12, with the following
changes:
> Thanks for your help, I'm not familiar with the devices status on upstream
> because not working on kernel upstream for a long time.
>
> > - commit subject
> > - dropped status from backlight (as there is no disabled common node
> >
> > and it's specific to the firefly itself)
> >
> > - quite some reordering of properties
> > - reordered regulator nodes per their addresses: 0x1b < 0x40
> > - dropped obsolete regulator-compatible properties
> > - fixed gpio-irq on the mpu6500
> > - dropped out-of-tree orientation properties of mpu6500
> >
> > --> please provide the optional "mount-matrix" in a follow-up patch
> >
> > see bindings/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050.txt
>
> Maybe we can drop this mpu6050 node first? I can't find binding file for it.
The binding (and driver in the kernel) is the same as for the mpu6050.
So you can find the documentation in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050.txt
Someone should add the other ids from
drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_i2c.c
to the binding.
mount-matrix is optional, so the basic node itself can stay in the dt.
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists