[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170413090005.ewdwm3on5u2urhxw@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:00:05 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Enabled schedstat when schedstat tracepoints
are enabled
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:56:07PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> During my tests, I see this in my dmesg:
>
> "Scheduler tracepoints stat_sleep, stat_iowait, stat_blocked and
> stat_runtime require the kernel parameter schedstats=enabled or
> kernel.sched_schedstats=1"
>
> And found the commit:
>
> cb2517653fc ("sched/debug: Make schedstats a runtime tunable that is
> disabled by default")
>
> Which states:
>
> "For tracepoints, there is a simple warning as it's not safe to activate
> schedstats in the context when it's known the tracepoint may be wanted
> but is unavailable."
>
> I'm assuming that Mel did not know about the TRACE_EVENT_FN() and
> DEFINE_EVENT_FN() that allow for callbacks for tracepoints as they are
> enabled and disabled. I do not see any reason for not enabling
> schedstat when one of its tracepoints are enabled.
>
> The state of schedstat is saved when the first tracepoint is enabled,
> and that state is put back when the tracepoints are disabled.
There is one additional complication with all this.
Dynamically enabling the sched_stats like this doesn't guarantee correct
information. So you've now taken away the informational print and
silently generate bollocks numbers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists