[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170413090754.wi2lqcdspm22zaia@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:07:54 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/9] doc: Synchronous RCU grace periods are
now legal throughout boot
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 09:40:14AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> This commit updates the "Early Boot" section of the RCU requirements
> to describe how synchronous RCU grace periods are now legal throughout
> the boot process.
You mean people would come an arrest you for doing it before? ;-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists