[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e379e57-b700-0b48-6e45-a5f6e3cc9010@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:05:24 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
qiuxishi@...wei.com, Kani Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@....com>,
slaoub@...il.com, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] mm, memory_hotplug: get rid of is_zone_device_section
On 04/10/2017 01:03 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>
> device memory hotplug hooks into regular memory hotplug only half way.
> It needs memory sections to track struct pages but there is no
> need/desire to associate those sections with memory blocks and export
> them to the userspace via sysfs because they cannot be onlined anyway.
>
> This is currently expressed by for_device argument to arch_add_memory
> which then makes sure to associate the given memory range with
> ZONE_DEVICE. register_new_memory then relies on is_zone_device_section
> to distinguish special memory hotplug from the regular one. While this
> works now, later patches in this series want to move __add_zone outside
> of arch_add_memory path so we have to come up with something else.
>
> Add want_memblock down the __add_pages path and use it to control
> whether the section->memblock association should be done. arch_add_memory
> then just trivially want memblock for everything but for_device hotplug.
>
> remove_memory_section doesn't need is_zone_device_section either. We can
> simply skip all the memblock specific cleanup if there is no memblock
> for the given section.
>
> This shouldn't introduce any functional change.
>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
For the fixed version:
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists