[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170413135828.GA24254@b29396-OptiPlex-7040>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 21:58:28 +0800
From: Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
leonard.crestez@....com, ping.bai@....com, anson.huang@....com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
broonie@...nel.org, octavian.purdila@....com,
kernel@...gutronix.de, fabio.estevam@....com, yibin.gong@....com,
shawnguo@...nel.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] clk: introduce clk_bulk_get accessories
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:01:29AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
...
> > This is a RFC patch intending to bring up the idea to discuss.
> >
> > Comments are welcome and appreciated!
>
> Thanks a lot for doing this, we have historically done something similar
> on ARCH_BRCMSTB platforms in our downstream tree with a concept of a
> "software" clock which has multiple parents (yikes), using the bulk
> accessors would essentially allow us to remove part of this hack, so I
> am all in favor of this!
Glad to see someone else has the same idea! :-)
Thanks for the supporting!
Regards
Dong Aisheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists