[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170413160343.GC29727@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:03:43 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: Tim Murray <timmurray@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, surenb@...gle.com,
totte@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1] add support for reclaiming priorities per mem cgroup
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:48:55AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > A more useful metric for memory pressure at this point is quantifying
> > that time you spend thrashing: time the job spends in direct reclaim
> > and on the flipside time the job waits for recently evicted pages to
> > come back. Combined, that gives you a good measure of overhead from
> > memory pressure; putting that in relation to a useful baseline of
> > meaningful work done gives you a portable scale of how effictively
> > your job is running.
> >
> > I'm working on that right now, hopefully I'll have something useful
> > soon.
>
> Johannes, is the work you are doing only about file pages or will it
> equally apply to anon pages as well?
It will work on both, with the caveat that *any* swapin is counted as
memory delay, whereas only cache misses of recently evicted entries
count toward it (we don't have timestamped shadow entries for anon).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists