[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170413161713.GC3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:17:13 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/40] rcu: Make arch select
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() strength
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:21:53AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:39:47AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > CONFIG_ARCH_WEAK_RELACQ Kconfig option.
>
> Naming in the changelog and patch don't match.
Good eyes! Fixed.
Thanx, Paul
> > +config ARCH_WEAK_RELEASE_ACQUIRE
> > + bool
> > +
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists