linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 3/6] zram: use zram_slot_lock instead of raw bit_spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1492052365-16169-4-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:59:22 +0900
From:   Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     <kernel-team@....com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] zram: use zram_slot_lock instead of raw bit_spin_lock op

With this clean-up phase, I want to use zram's wrapper function
to lock table access which is more consistent with other zram's
functions.

Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index c4445995fd13..931fe099dbc8 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -415,24 +415,38 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(io_stat);
 static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(mm_stat);
 static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(debug_stat);
 
+static void zram_slot_lock(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
+{
+	struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
+
+	bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+}
+
+static void zram_slot_unlock(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
+{
+	struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
+
+	bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+}
+
 static bool zram_same_page_read(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
 				struct page *page,
 				unsigned int offset, unsigned int len)
 {
 	struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
 
-	bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+	zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
 	if (unlikely(!meta->table[index].handle) ||
 			zram_test_flag(meta, index, ZRAM_SAME)) {
 		void *mem;
 
-		bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+		zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
 		mem = kmap_atomic(page);
 		zram_fill_page(mem + offset, len, meta->table[index].element);
 		kunmap_atomic(mem);
 		return true;
 	}
-	bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+	zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
 
 	return false;
 }
@@ -448,11 +462,11 @@ static bool zram_same_page_write(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
 
 		kunmap_atomic(mem);
 		/* Free memory associated with this sector now. */
-		bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+		zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
 		zram_free_page(zram, index);
 		zram_set_flag(meta, index, ZRAM_SAME);
 		zram_set_element(meta, index, element);
-		bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+		zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
 
 		atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.same_pages);
 		return true;
@@ -559,7 +573,7 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct zram *zram, struct page *page, u32 index)
 	if (zram_same_page_read(zram, index, page, 0, PAGE_SIZE))
 		return 0;
 
-	bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+	zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
 	handle = meta->table[index].handle;
 	size = zram_get_obj_size(meta, index);
 
@@ -578,7 +592,7 @@ static int zram_decompress_page(struct zram *zram, struct page *page, u32 index)
 		zcomp_stream_put(zram->comp);
 	}
 	zs_unmap_object(meta->mem_pool, handle);
-	bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+	zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
 
 	/* Should NEVER happen. Return bio error if it does. */
 	if (unlikely(ret))
@@ -727,11 +741,11 @@ static int __zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index)
 	 * Free memory associated with this sector
 	 * before overwriting unused sectors.
 	 */
-	bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+	zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
 	zram_free_page(zram, index);
 	meta->table[index].handle = handle;
 	zram_set_obj_size(meta, index, comp_len);
-	bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+	zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
 
 	/* Update stats */
 	atomic64_add(comp_len, &zram->stats.compr_data_size);
@@ -789,7 +803,6 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
 			     int offset, struct bio *bio)
 {
 	size_t n = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
-	struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta;
 
 	/*
 	 * zram manages data in physical block size units. Because logical block
@@ -810,9 +823,9 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram *zram, u32 index,
 	}
 
 	while (n >= PAGE_SIZE) {
-		bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+		zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
 		zram_free_page(zram, index);
-		bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+		zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
 		atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.notify_free);
 		index++;
 		n -= PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -922,9 +935,9 @@ static void zram_slot_free_notify(struct block_device *bdev,
 	zram = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
 	meta = zram->meta;
 
-	bit_spin_lock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+	zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
 	zram_free_page(zram, index);
-	bit_spin_unlock(ZRAM_ACCESS, &meta->table[index].value);
+	zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
 	atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.notify_free);
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4