lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:24:27 -0700
From:   Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
To:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        yurovsky@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] ARM: dts: imx7s: Add node for GPC

On 13 April 2017 at 12:18, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> I've been testing your GPC/PCIe patch sets against v4.11-rc5 on my
>> imx7d-cl-som-imx7, but hit a bit of a wall. When gpc is set as the
>> interrupt-parent for the soc, the kernel seems to hang and not produce
>> any output on the serial port[0]. I tried to enable earlyprintk, but
>> no luck getting a trace. Reversing this change, gets the board
>> booting[1], but obviously isn't using the gpc which is needed for PCIe
>> support as I understand it. I assume you've tested these changes on a
>> imx7d-sdb and are not seeing a similar issue? You can find the patches
>> I've picked on top of v4.11-rc5 here[2], any idea what might be the
>> issue?
>
> Thanks for the report.

No problem.

> It seems this series depends on the drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c patches
> that landed into linux-next.

Are you referring to the following patches?

"dt-bindings: Add GPCv2 power gating driver"
"soc: imx: Add GPCv2 power gating driver"

I've pulled these patches from Shawn's tree to test with, but still
not able to get anything functional. Is there another series I should
be looking at?

Thanks,

Tyler

Powered by blists - more mailing lists