linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: bios with an offset are always gappy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170413203517.GA27520@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
Date:   Thu, 13 Apr 2017 22:35:17 +0200
From:   Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>
To:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc:     Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Linux Block Layer Mailinglist <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: bios with an offset are always gappy

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:45:10PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> +		/*
> +		 * don't merge if the 1st bio starts with non-zero
> +		 * offset, otherwise it is quite difficult to respect
> +		 * sg gap limit. We work hard to merge huge of small
> +		 * bios in case of mkfs.

"huge of small bios in case" - -ENOPARSE.

"huge numbers of"?
"huge or small"?

HTH,

Andreas Mohr