[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170413210218.GA24910@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:02:18 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc: mayurkumar.patel@...el.com, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 3/5] PCI/ASPM: add init hook to device_add
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 03:48:00PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Hi Sinan,
>
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 12:55:49AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > For bridges, have pcie_aspm_init_link_state() allocate a link_state,
> > regardless of whether it currently has any children.
> >
> > pcie_aspm_init_link_state(): Called for bridges (upstream end of
> > link) after all children have been enumerated. No longer needs to
> > check aspm_support_enabled or pdev->has_secondary_link or the VIA
> > quirk: pci_aspm_init() already checked that stuff, so we only need
> > to check pdev->link_state here.
> >
> > Now that we are calling alloc_pcie_link_state() from pci_aspm_init()
> > , get rid of pci_function_0 function and detect downstream link in
> > pci_aspm_init_upstream() instead when the function number is 0.
> >
> > Fixes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194895
> > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > index a80d64b..e33f84b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > @@ -422,20 +422,6 @@ static void pcie_aspm_check_latency(struct pci_dev *endpoint)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * The L1 PM substate capability is only implemented in function 0 in a
> > - * multi function device.
> > - */
> > -static struct pci_dev *pci_function_0(struct pci_bus *linkbus)
> > -{
> > - struct pci_dev *child;
> > -
> > - list_for_each_entry(child, &linkbus->devices, bus_list)
> > - if (PCI_FUNC(child->devfn) == 0)
> > - return child;
> > - return NULL;
> > -}
> > -
> > /* Calculate L1.2 PM substate timing parameters */
> > static void aspm_calc_l1ss_info(struct pcie_link_state *link,
> > struct aspm_register_info *upreg,
> > @@ -798,7 +784,6 @@ static struct pcie_link_state *alloc_pcie_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&link->children);
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&link->link);
> > link->pdev = pdev;
> > - link->downstream = pci_function_0(pdev->subordinate);
> >
> > /*
> > * Root Ports and PCI/PCI-X to PCIe Bridges are roots of PCIe
> > @@ -828,11 +813,33 @@ static struct pcie_link_state *alloc_pcie_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >
> > static int pci_aspm_init_downstream(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > {
> > + struct pcie_link_state *link;
> > + struct pci_dev *parent;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The L1 PM substate capability is only implemented in function 0 in a
> > + * multi function device.
> > + */
> > + if (PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn) != 0)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + parent = pdev->bus->self;
> > + if (!parent)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + link = parent->link_state;
> > + link->downstream = pdev;
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int pci_aspm_init_upstream(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > {
> > + struct pcie_link_state *link;
> > +
> > + link = alloc_pcie_link_state(pdev);
> > + if (!link)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> This allocates the link_state when we enumerate a Downstream Port
> instead of when we enumerate a child device. We want the link_state
> lifetime to match that of the Downstream Port, so this seems good.
>
> But we shouldn't at the same time change the link_state deallocation
> so it happens when the Downstream Port is removed, not when the child
> device is removed?
I do see that you change the deallocation in patch [5/5], but I think
the deallocation change should be in the same patch as the allocation
change. Otherwise I think we have a use-after-free problem in this
sequence:
# initial enumeration
pci_device_add(downstream_port)
pci_aspm_init(downstream_port)
alloc_pcie_link_state
pci_device_add(endpoint)
pci_aspm_init(endpoint)
# hot-remove endpoint
pci_stop_dev(endpoint)
pcie_aspm_exit_link_state(endpoint)
link = parent->link_state
free_link_state(link)
# hot-add endpoint
pci_aspm_init(endpoint)
link = parent->link_state <--- use after free
Powered by blists - more mailing lists