[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <faa953d1-61bd-4b53-af0d-1980d9b55d68@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:33:13 -0600
From: "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: christoffer.dall@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
lenb@...nel.org, matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, robert.moore@...el.com,
lv.zheng@...el.com, nkaje@...eaurora.org, zjzhang@...eaurora.org,
mark.rutland@....com, james.morse@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, eun.taik.lee@...sung.com,
sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com, labbott@...hat.com,
shijie.huang@....com, rruigrok@...eaurora.org,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, tn@...ihalf.com, fu.wei@...aro.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bristot@...hat.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...ica.org, Suzuki.Poulose@....com, punit.agrawal@....com,
astone@...hat.com, harba@...eaurora.org, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
john.garry@...wei.com, shiju.jose@...wei.com, joe@...ches.com,
gengdongjiu@...wei.com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V14 02/10] ras: acpi/apei: cper: generic error data entry
v3 per ACPI 6.1
On 4/13/2017 2:47 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 02:30:21PM -0600, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
>> I do not agree with this. The struct being passed to this function is
>> already named acpi_hest_generic_data in the existing code and all over this
>> code is named gdata not just d.
> And I'm saying they're too long - the preexisting ones and the ones
> you're adding - and impair readability. This whole driver is one
> unreadable ugly pile and if I were the maintainer I would never allowed
> it in its current form.
>
> But I don't think it really has a maintainer - poor Rafael has to deal
> with it because it is under drivers/acpi/ and that whole RAS firmware
> crap got thrown over the wall at some point and now we're stuck with it.
>
> So this is just my opinion since he asked me to take a look.
Okay, that makes sense. I'd prefer to avoid completely re-writing the
existing code in this patch set :)
Thanks,
Tyler
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists