linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 2/3] sched/topology: fix sched groups on NUMA machines with mesh topology

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1492126685.8850.189.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:38:05 -0400
From:   Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:     lvenanci@...hat.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lwang@...hat.com,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] sched/topology: fix sched groups on NUMA machines
 with mesh topology

On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 18:06 -0300, Lauro Venancio wrote:

> Just for clarification, I am sending the nodes distance table for the
> two most common typologies affected by this issue.

What do the sched groups look like for these topologies,
before and after your patch series?

> 4 nodes, ring topology
> node distances:
> node   0   1   2   3
>   0:  10  20  30  20
>   1:  20  10  20  30
>   2:  30  20  10  20
>   3:  20  30  20  10
> 
> 8 node, mesh topology
> node distances:
> node   0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7
>   0:  10  16  16  22  16  22  16  22
>   1:  16  10  16  22  22  16  22  16
>   2:  16  16  10  16  16  16  16  22
>   3:  22  22  16  10  16  16  22  16
>   4:  16  22  16  16  10  16  16  16
>   5:  22  16  16  16  16  10  22  22
>   6:  16  22  16  22  16  22  10  16
>   7:  22  16  22  16  16  22  16  10