[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-a8b7a92318b6d7779f6d8e9aa6ba0e3de01a8943@git.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 02:26:44 -0700
From: tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: brgerst@...il.com, hpa@...or.com, bp@...en8.de, luto@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, davej@...emonkey.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dvlasenk@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, jpoimboe@...hat.com
Subject: [tip:x86/asm] x86/unwind: Silence entry-related warnings
Commit-ID: a8b7a92318b6d7779f6d8e9aa6ba0e3de01a8943
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a8b7a92318b6d7779f6d8e9aa6ba0e3de01a8943
Author: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:47:12 -0500
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 10:20:06 +0200
x86/unwind: Silence entry-related warnings
A few people have reported unwinder warnings like the following:
WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffffc90000fe7ff0 in rsync:1157 has bad value (null)
unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:2 graph_idx:0
ffffc90000fe7f98: ffffc90000fe7ff0 (0xffffc90000fe7ff0)
ffffc90000fe7fa0: ffffffffb7000f56 (trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c)
ffffc90000fe7fa8: 0000000000000246 (0x246)
ffffc90000fe7fb0: 0000000000000000 ...
ffffc90000fe7fc0: 00007ffe3af639bc (0x7ffe3af639bc)
ffffc90000fe7fc8: 0000000000000006 (0x6)
ffffc90000fe7fd0: 00007f80af433fc5 (0x7f80af433fc5)
ffffc90000fe7fd8: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0)
ffffc90000fe7fe0: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0)
ffffc90000fe7fe8: 00007ffe3af63970 (0x7ffe3af63970)
ffffc90000fe7ff0: 0000000000000000 ...
ffffc90000fe7ff8: ffffffffb7b74b9a (entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x17/0x4f)
This warning can happen when unwinding a code path where an interrupt
occurred in x86 entry code before it set up the first stack frame.
Silently ignore any warnings for this case.
Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/dbd6838826466a60dc23a52098185bc973ce2f1e.1492020577.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h
index 5663425..9b10dcd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ struct unwind_state {
struct task_struct *task;
int graph_idx;
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
+ bool got_irq;
unsigned long *bp, *orig_sp;
struct pt_regs *regs;
unsigned long ip;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
index c67a059..c461135 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/sched/task.h>
#include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <asm/sections.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <asm/bitops.h>
#include <asm/stacktrace.h>
@@ -72,6 +74,21 @@ static size_t regs_size(struct pt_regs *regs)
return sizeof(*regs);
}
+static bool in_entry_code(unsigned long ip)
+{
+ char *addr = (char *)ip;
+
+ if (addr >= __entry_text_start && addr < __entry_text_end)
+ return true;
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER) || defined(CONFIG_KASAN)
+ if (addr >= __irqentry_text_start && addr < __irqentry_text_end)
+ return true;
+#endif
+
+ return false;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
#define GCC_REALIGN_WORDS 3
#else
@@ -144,6 +161,7 @@ static bool update_stack_state(struct unwind_state *state,
if (regs) {
frame = (unsigned long *)regs;
len = regs_size(regs);
+ state->got_irq = true;
} else {
frame = next_bp;
len = FRAME_HEADER_SIZE;
@@ -239,16 +257,8 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
next_bp = (unsigned long *)READ_ONCE_TASK_STACK(state->task, *state->bp);
/* Move to the next frame if it's safe: */
- if (!update_stack_state(state, next_bp)) {
- /*
- * Don't warn on bad regs->bp. An interrupt in entry code
- * might cause a false positive warning.
- */
- if (state->regs)
- goto the_end;
-
+ if (!update_stack_state(state, next_bp))
goto bad_address;
- }
return true;
@@ -263,6 +273,13 @@ bad_address:
if (state->task != current)
goto the_end;
+ /*
+ * Don't warn if the unwinder got lost due to an interrupt in entry
+ * code before the stack was set up:
+ */
+ if (state->got_irq && in_entry_code(state->ip))
+ goto the_end;
+
if (state->regs) {
printk_deferred_once(KERN_WARNING
"WARNING: kernel stack regs at %p in %s:%d has bad 'bp' value %p\n",
@@ -289,6 +306,7 @@ void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
memset(state, 0, sizeof(*state));
state->task = task;
+ state->got_irq = (regs);
/* Don't even attempt to start from user mode regs: */
if (regs && user_mode(regs)) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists