[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170414113517.323ab297@bbrezillon>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:35:17 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@....com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
liviu.dudau@....com, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/6] Introduce writeback connectors
Hi Brian,
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 16:48:58 +0000
Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@....com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is v3 of my series introducing a new connector type:
> DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_WRITEBACK
> See v1 and v2 here: [1] [2]
>
> Writeback connectors are used to expose the memory writeback engines
> found in some display controllers, which can write a CRTC's
> composition result to a memory buffer.
> This is useful e.g. for testing, screen-recording, screenshots,
> wireless display, display cloning, memory-to-memory composition.
>
> Writeback connectors are given a WRITEBACK_FB_ID property (which acts
> slightly differently to FB_ID, so gets a new name), as well as
> a PIXEL_FORMATS blob to list the supported writeback formats, and
> OUT_FENCE_PTR to be used for out-fences.
>
> The changes since v2 are in the commit messages of each commit.
>
> The main differences are:
> - Subclass drm_connector as drm_writeback_connector
> - Slight relaxation of core checks, to allow
> (connector->crtc && !connector->fb)
> - Dropped PIXEL_FORMATS_SIZE, which was redundant
> - Reworked the event interface, drivers don't need to deal with the
> fence directly
> - Re-ordered the commits to introduce writeback out-fences up-front.
>
> I've kept RFC on this series because the event reporting (introduction
> of drm_writeback_job) is probably up for debate.
>
> v4 will be accompanied by igt tests.
I plan to add writeback support to the VC4 driver and wanted to know if
anything has changed since this v3 (IOW, do you have a v4 + igt tests
ready)?
>
> As always, I look forward to any comments.
I'll try to review these patches. Keep in mind that I didn't follow the
initial discussions and might suggest things or ask questions that have
already been answered in previous versions of this series or on IRC.
Regards,
Boris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists