linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Make ANDROID a menuconfig to ease disabling it all

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170414123226.GB17217@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:32:26 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@...il.com>
Cc:     arve@...roid.com, riandrews@...roid.com,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make ANDROID a menuconfig to ease disabling it all

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:46:07AM +0200, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> >> No need to get into the submenu to disable all ANDROID-related config entries
> >
> > I don't understand this, what exactly do you mean?
> 
> This is intended for people using make menuconfig to tailor
> their kernel config to their need by disabling all options they
> don't need. In order to have a smaller kernel, for example,
> but also to get smaller build times.

That's fine, but you aren't actually changing the functionality of any
of the build options here.  You are just adding a 'menu' and showing
things a bit differently.  You aren't changing any dependancies (which
is what dictates what is and is not built), which does not make it
easier, or harder, to disable/enable anything here.

I'm not against this, but you need to explain it a lot better as to what
you are doing and why.  The "why" isn't covered by the "this will make
the kernel build smaller", as that's just not true :)

thanks,

greg k-h