lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:37:20 -0600 From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>, Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Ming Lin <ming.l@....samsung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, fcoe-devel@...n-fcoe.org, open-iscsi@...glegroups.com, megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com, sparmaintainer@...sys.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, rds-devel@....oracle.com, Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>, Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/22] libiscsi: Make use of new the sg_map helper function On 14/04/17 02:36 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 04:05:16PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: >> Convert the kmap and kmap_atomic uses to the sg_map function. We now >> store the flags for the kmap instead of a boolean to indicate >> atomicitiy. We also propogate a possible kmap error down and create >> a new ISCSI_TCP_INTERNAL_ERR error type for this. > > Can you split out the new error handling into a separate prep patch > which should go to the iscsi maintainers ASAP? > Yes, I can do that. I'd just have thought they'd want to see the use case for the new error before accepting a patch like that... Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists