linux-kernel - Applied "regulator: vctrl: Fix out of bounds array access for vctrl->vtable" to the regulator tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1cz4lk-0005hn-HI@debutante>
Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2017 18:12:24 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: vctrl: Fix out of bounds array access for vctrl->vtable" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: vctrl: Fix out of bounds array access for vctrl->vtable

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From a9bbb453b50c91295ab362e4832eb37fd4e6785d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 10:50:43 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: vctrl: Fix out of bounds array access for
 vctrl->vtable

Current code only allocates rdesc->n_voltages entries for vctrl->vtable.
Thus use rdesc->n_voltages instead of n_voltages in the for loop.

While at it, also switch to use devm_kcalloc instead of devm_kmalloc_array
+ __GFP_ZERO flag and fix the argument order.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
index 6baadef0ed74..78de002037c7 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
@@ -345,9 +345,9 @@ static int vctrl_init_vtable(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	vctrl->vtable = devm_kmalloc_array(
-		&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct vctrl_voltage_table),
-		rdesc->n_voltages, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
+	vctrl->vtable = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, rdesc->n_voltages,
+				     sizeof(struct vctrl_voltage_table),
+				     GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!vctrl->vtable)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ static int vctrl_init_vtable(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	     NULL);
 
 	/* pre-calculate OVP-safe downward transitions */
-	for (i = n_voltages - 1; i > 0; i--) {
+	for (i = rdesc->n_voltages - 1; i > 0; i--) {
 		int j;
 		int ovp_min_uV = (vctrl->vtable[i].out *
 				  (100 - vctrl->ovp_threshold)) / 100;
-- 
2.11.0