[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1704142102110.2327@nanos>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 21:04:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [GIT pull] irq fixes for 4.11
Linus,
please pull the latest irq-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git irq-urgent-for-linus
The irq department provides:
- Two fixes for the CPU affinity spread infrastructure to prevent
unbalanced spreading in corner cases which leads to horrible
performance, because interrupts are rather aggregated than spread
- Add a missing spinlock initializer in the imx-gpcv2 init code
Thanks,
tglx
------------------>
Keith Busch (2):
irq/affinity: Fix CPU spread for unbalanced nodes
irq/affinity: Fix extra vecs calculation
Tyler Baker (1):
irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2: Fix spinlock initialization
drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c | 2 ++
kernel/irq/affinity.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c
index 15af9a9753e5..2d203b422129 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c
@@ -230,6 +230,8 @@ static int __init imx_gpcv2_irqchip_init(struct device_node *node,
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&cd->rlock);
+
cd->gpc_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
if (!cd->gpc_base) {
pr_err("fsl-gpcv2: unable to map gpc registers\n");
diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
index 4544b115f5eb..d052947fe785 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static int get_nodes_in_cpumask(const struct cpumask *mask, nodemask_t *nodemsk)
struct cpumask *
irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
{
- int n, nodes, vecs_per_node, cpus_per_vec, extra_vecs, curvec;
+ int n, nodes, cpus_per_vec, extra_vecs, curvec;
int affv = nvecs - affd->pre_vectors - affd->post_vectors;
int last_affv = affv + affd->pre_vectors;
nodemask_t nodemsk = NODE_MASK_NONE;
@@ -94,19 +94,21 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
goto done;
}
- /* Spread the vectors per node */
- vecs_per_node = affv / nodes;
- /* Account for rounding errors */
- extra_vecs = affv - (nodes * vecs_per_node);
-
for_each_node_mask(n, nodemsk) {
- int ncpus, v, vecs_to_assign = vecs_per_node;
+ int ncpus, v, vecs_to_assign, vecs_per_node;
+
+ /* Spread the vectors per node */
+ vecs_per_node = (affv - curvec) / nodes;
/* Get the cpus on this node which are in the mask */
cpumask_and(nmsk, cpu_online_mask, cpumask_of_node(n));
/* Calculate the number of cpus per vector */
ncpus = cpumask_weight(nmsk);
+ vecs_to_assign = min(vecs_per_node, ncpus);
+
+ /* Account for rounding errors */
+ extra_vecs = ncpus - vecs_to_assign * (ncpus / vecs_to_assign);
for (v = 0; curvec < last_affv && v < vecs_to_assign;
curvec++, v++) {
@@ -115,14 +117,14 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
/* Account for extra vectors to compensate rounding errors */
if (extra_vecs) {
cpus_per_vec++;
- if (!--extra_vecs)
- vecs_per_node++;
+ --extra_vecs;
}
irq_spread_init_one(masks + curvec, nmsk, cpus_per_vec);
}
if (curvec >= last_affv)
break;
+ --nodes;
}
done:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists