[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170414025043.13680-1-axel.lin@ingics.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 10:50:43 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: vctrl: Fix out of bounds array access for vctrl->vtable
Current code only allocates rdesc->n_voltages entries for vctrl->vtable.
Thus use rdesc->n_voltages instead of n_voltages in the for loop.
While at it, also switch to use devm_kcalloc instead of devm_kmalloc_array
+ __GFP_ZERO flag and fix the argument order.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
---
drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
index 6baadef..78de002 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
@@ -345,9 +345,9 @@ static int vctrl_init_vtable(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -EINVAL;
}
- vctrl->vtable = devm_kmalloc_array(
- &pdev->dev, sizeof(struct vctrl_voltage_table),
- rdesc->n_voltages, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
+ vctrl->vtable = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, rdesc->n_voltages,
+ sizeof(struct vctrl_voltage_table),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (!vctrl->vtable)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ static int vctrl_init_vtable(struct platform_device *pdev)
NULL);
/* pre-calculate OVP-safe downward transitions */
- for (i = n_voltages - 1; i > 0; i--) {
+ for (i = rdesc->n_voltages - 1; i > 0; i--) {
int j;
int ovp_min_uV = (vctrl->vtable[i].out *
(100 - vctrl->ovp_threshold)) / 100;
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists