[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170414050747.GB462@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 14:07:47 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
kernel-team@....com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] zram: fix operator precedence to get offset
Hello,
On (04/13/17 09:17), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]
> diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> index 9e2199060040..83c38a123242 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> @@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ static int zram_rw_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
> }
>
> index = sector >> SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT;
> - offset = sector & (SECTORS_PER_PAGE - 1) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> + offset = (sector & (SECTORS_PER_PAGE - 1)) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
sorry, can it actually produce different results?
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists